Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 17 results ...
Arditi, D and Balci, G (2009) Managerial Competencies of Female and Male Construction Managers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1275–8.
Cable, J K, Jaselskis, E J, Walters, R C, Li, L and Bauer, C R (2009) Stringless Portland Cement Concrete Paving. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1253–60.
Caerteling, J S, Halman, J I M, Song, M and Dorée, A G (2009) Impact of Government and Corporate Strategy on the Performance of Technology Projects in Road Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1211–21.
Chan, A P C, Chan, D W M and Yeung, J F Y (2009) Overview of the Application of “Fuzzy Techniques” in Construction Management Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1241–52.
Chan, A P C, Lam, P T I, Chan, D W M, Cheung, E and Ke, Y (2009) Drivers for Adopting Public Private Partnerships—Empirical Comparison between China and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1115–24.
Chen, C and Orr, R J (2009) Chinese Contractors in Africa: Home Government Support, Coordination Mechanisms, and Market Entry Strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1201–10.
Chen, H L (2009) Model for Predicting Financial Performance of Development and Construction Corporations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1190–200.
El-Rayes, K and Jun, D H (2009) Optimizing Resource Leveling in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1172–80.
Goh, Y M and Chua, D K H (2009) Case-Based Reasoning for Construction Hazard Identification: Case Representation and Retrieval. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1181–9.
Gransberg, D D and Riemer, C (2009) Impact of Inaccurate Engineer’s Estimated Quantities on Unit Price Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1138–45.
Lee, H, Seo, J, Park, M, Ryu, H and Kwon, S (2009) Transaction-Cost-Based Selection of Appropriate General Contractor-Subcontractor Relationship Type. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1232–40.
Park, M, Ji, S, Lee, H and Kim, W (2009) Strategies for Design-Build in Korea Using System Dynamics Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1125–37.
Park, S H (2009) Whole Life Performance Assessment: Critical Success Factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1146–61.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Life cycles; Assessment; Costs; Contracts; Construction management; Contract management; Bids;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000090
- Abstract:
Whole life costing (WLC) has become the best practice in construction procurement and it is likely to be a major issue in predicting whole life costs of a construction project accurately. However, different expectations from different organizations throughout a project’s life and the lack of data, monitoring targets, and long-term interest for many key players are obstacles to be overcome if WLC is to be implemented. A questionnaire survey was undertaken to investigate a set of ten common factors and 188 individual factors. These were grouped into eight critical categories (project scope, time, cost, quality, contract/administration, human resource, risk, and health and safety) by project phase, as perceived by the clients, contractors and subcontractors in order to identify critical success factors for whole life performance assessment (WLPA). Using a relative importance index, the top ten critical factors for each category, from the perspective of project participants, were analyzed and ranked. Their agreement on those categories and factors were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. All participants identify “Type of Project” as the most common critical factor in the eight categories for WLPA. Using the relative index ranking technique and weighted average methods, it was found that the most critical individual factors in each category were: “clarity of contract” (scope); “fixed construction period” (time); “precise project budget estimate” (cost); “material quality” (quality); “mutual/trusting relationships” (contract/administration); “leadership/team management” (human resource); and “management of work safety on site” (health and safety). There was relatively a high agreement on these categories among all participants. Obviously, with 80 critical factors of WLPA, there is a stronger positive relationship between client and contactor rather than contractor and subcontractor, client and subcontractor. Putting these critical factors into a criteria matrix can facilitate an initial framework of WLPA in order to aid decision making in the public sector in South Korea for evaluation/selection process of a construction project at the bid stage.
Park, T, Kim, M K, Kim, C and Kim, H (2009) Interactive 3D CAD for Effective Derrick Crane Operation in a Cable-Stayed Bridge Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1261–70.
San Cristóbal, J R (2009) Time, Cost, and Quality in a Road Building Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1271–4.
Wethyavivorn, P, Charoenngam, C and Teerajetgul, W (2009) Strategic Assets Driving Organizational Capabilities of Thai Construction Firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1222–31.
Zahraie, B and Tavakolan, M (2009) Stochastic Time-Cost-Resource Utilization Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm and Discrete Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1162–71.